So, I call $company. The automated system guides me through the hoops, in particular, asking for my "secure credentials", normally "the last four". Then it connects me to a representative.
And the first thing the representative says is: "What are your last four"?
WHAT?
I just identified myself to your automated system.
It authenticated me.
Why do *you* need to hear it again?
If this is a part of the $company's protocol, it's redundant.
If this is an unscrupulous employee harvesting personally identifiable information, it's a vulnerability.
The problem is, you cannot distinguish between the two. So either way, we're screwed.
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Thursday, August 20, 2015
Full-Time Employees: Who wins? Who loses?
Just read The Case Against Full-Time Employees.
There's no TL;DR, read it if you care to compare it with my counterpoint, which is pretty simple:
That party is *you*, the customer.
Note that pay is not necessarily monetary.
There's no TL;DR, read it if you care to compare it with my counterpoint, which is pretty simple:
- A long term full time employee is a known variable.
- Freelancers and contractors are the unknown.
- The more is known, the less uncertainty.
- The more uncertainty, the more risk.
- The more risk, the more threat.
- The more threat, the more contingency.
- Somebody has to pay for the contingency.
- Business can't pay the contingency, it has to be profitable.
- That leaves only one party that can be held responsible for paying.
That party is *you*, the customer.
Note that pay is not necessarily monetary.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)